List of failed and overbudget custom software projects

This is a list of notable custom software projects which have significantly failed to achieve some or all of their objectives, either temporarily or permanently, and/or have suffered from significant cost overruns. For a list of successful major custom software projects, see Custom software[1] #Major project successes.

Note that failed projects, and projects running over budget, are not necessarily the sole fault of the employees or businesses creating the software. In some cases, problems may be due partly to problems with the purchasing organisation, including poor requirements, over-ambitious requirements, unnecessary requirements, poor contract drafting, poor contract management, poor end-user training, or poor operational management.

Permanent failures

edit

Because software, unlike a major civil engineering construction project, is often easy and cheap to change after it has been constructed, a piece of custom software that fails to deliver on its objectives may sometimes be modified over time in such a way that it later succeeds—and/or business processes or end-user mindsets may change to accommodate the software. However, sometimes, for various reasons, neither approach succeeds (or is even tried), and this may be considered as another level of failure—a permanent failure.

StartedTerminatedSystem nameType of systemCountry or regionType of purchaserProblemsCost (expected)Outsourced or in-house?Outcome
1980s1993TAURUSElectronic trading platform  United Kingdom (London)Stock exchangeScope creep, cost overrun. The project was never completed.£75m?Cancelled
19821994FAA Advanced Automation SystemAir Traffic Control  United StatesFederal Aviation AdministrationCost overruns, underestimation of ATC complexity, delays, non-incremental change. existing system.[2]$3–6b?Scrapped
19841990RISPIntegrated computer services  United Kingdom (Wessex)Wessex Health AuthorityScope creep, cost overrun. The project was never completed.£63m (£29m)?Cancelled
19941999INCISCrime information  New ZealandNew Zealand PoliceFrequently changing development staff, hardware, software and scope.approx NZD$110mOutsourced to IBM NZCancelled, then hardware partially reused
19972000BolitCustomer service, finance and administration system  SwedenPatent and Registration OfficeToo complicated, bad functioning, cost overrun. The project was after completion never used, the agency still today does not have a working IT system. [3][4][as of?]SEK 300m ($35m)OutsourcedScrapped
19992006CSIO PortalCommon technological platform for brokers and insurers to improve workflow efficiency  CanadaCentre for Study of Insurance OperationsLow user adoption, conflict between insurers, new technology, lack of funding~$15 million CAD"CSIO portal abandoned due to lack of insurer support and availability of other solutions".Outsourced to IBM"Reconfiguring CSIO".Abandoned
20002009Customer Account Data EngineSystem for handling tax records and processing tax returns, replacement for the Individual Master File and others  United StatesInternal Revenue ServiceLow user adoption, performance issues, scope creep, never replaced IMF and other mainframe software, some dating back to the Kennedy Administration~US$500 millionOutsourced to IBM, Northrop Grumman and othersAbandoned, intended to be replaced by CADE 2
20022011NHS Connecting for HealthElectronic care records  United KingdomCentral governmentBeset by delays and ballooning costs, and the software part of it was never finished. The government was also criticised for not demonstrating value for money. Although the contracts were drafted to ensure that the contractors would be forced to bear a significant portion of the cost of the project going wrong if it did go wrong, in reality this did not always happen. The NPfIT was described by Members of Parliament as one of the "worst and most expensive contracting fiascos" ever.[5]£12bn (£2.3bn)OutsourcedDiscontinued, but some parts continued
20052012Expeditionary Combat Support SystemMilitary Enterprise Resource Planning  United StatesAir forceNo significant capabilities ready on time; would have cost $1.1bn more just to get to 1/4 of the original scope.$1.1bnOutsourced – including requirementsCancelled
20072012da:PolsagPolice case management  DenmarkPoliceDid not work properly, technical problems with contractor.DKK 500m ($70m)OutsourcedCancelled
20072014e-BordersAdvanced passenger information programme  United KingdomUK Border AgencyA series of delays.over £412m (£742m)OutsourcedCancelled
20072010Försäkringskassan SAPDental health service system  SwedenSocial Insurance AgencyNot fit for purpose, multiple delays, cost overrun.SEK 10bn ($1.18bn)[6]Outsourced, then insourcedCancelled[7]
20082013Digital Media InitiativeDigital production, media asset management  United KingdomPublic service broadcasterBy 2013, the project was judged to be obsolete (as much cheaper commercial off the shelf alternatives by then existed) and was scrapped by BBC management. The Director-General of the BBC said it had been a huge waste of money.[8]more than £98m (£81.7m)Outsourced, then insourced, then outsourced againCancelled
20092013The Surrey Integrated Reporting Enterprise Network (SIREN)Crime & criminal intelligence logging system  United Kingdom (Surrey)Police ForceNot fit for purpose[9]£14.8mOutsourcedScrapped
20112014Pust SiebelPolice case management  SwedenPolicePoor functioning, inefficient in work environments.[10]SEK 300m ($35m)[11]OutsourcedScrapped
20122014Cover OregonHealthcare exchange website  United StatesState governmentSite was never able to accept online enrollments, so users were instructed to mail in paper enrollments instead.approx $200mOutsourcedCancelled, then client and supplier both sued each other
2017[12]2023[13]Distributed Ledger Technology (generic name)Electronic trading platform  AustraliaAustralian Stock ExchangeSystem was too complex and only 60% completed$AU 170m expendedOutsourcedCancelled

Temporary issues and budget overruns

edit
StartedSystem nameType of systemCountry or regionType of purchaserProblemsCost (expected)Outsourced or in-house?
1992LASCADComputer-aided dispatch for emergency ambulances  United Kingdom (London)Central governmentAmbulance delays and other problems were caused by the introduction of the system. More than 30 people may have died as a result, making it the largest computer-related disaster until the downing of Boeing 737 MAX planes in 2019. The Chief of the London Ambulance Service resigned as a result of the problems and the adverse publicity.£1.5mOutsourced
2002Smart Systems for Health / eHealth OntarioElectronic health recordOntario, CanadaProvincial governmenteHealth Ontario is a group of projects that replaced a previous failed project, Smart Systems for Health, which "spent $650 million but failed to produce anything of lasting value." However, in 2009 the CEO of the eHealth Ontario agency resigned, followed by the government minister responsible for overseeing the agency, after a scandal over excessive payments to consultants. In the next audit in 2016, the Auditor General of Ontario noted that 14 years after Smart Systems for Health was started, not all of the eHealth projects were complete, and it was impossible to even determine if they were overbudget because the government had never originally put a budget on them.[14]Can$8bn (unknown)In-house, but with heavy use of consultants
2013HealthCare.govHealthcare exchange website[15]  United StatesFederal governmentBy some estimates, only 1% of people managed to successfully enroll with the site in its first week of operation.[15] On October 20, 2013, President Barack Obama remarked, "There's no sugar coating: the website has been too slow, people have been getting stuck during the application process and I think it's fair to say that nobody's more frustrated by that than I am."$1.5bn ($93.7m)Outsourced
2013Queensland Health Payroll SystemPayroll system  AustraliaState governmentThe Queensland Health Payroll System was launched in 2010 in what could be considered one of the most spectacularly over budget projects in Australian history, coming in at over 200 times the original budget. In spite of promises that the new system would be fully automated, the new system required a considerable amount of manual operation.[16]$AUD 1.2bn ($6m)Outsourced

Projects with ongoing problems

edit

Until the significant problems with these projects are resolved, or the projects cancelled, it is not yet possible to classify them into one of the above categories.

StartedSystem nameType of systemCountry or regionType of purchaserProblemsCost (expected)Outsourced or in-house?
2013Canada.caGovernment website portal  CanadaCentral governmentOriginal plan was to consolidate 1,500 Canadian government websites into a single portal on a single platform. In over three years, only 10,000 webpages of a total 17 million have successfully been migrated.[17][18]$9.4 million + $28 million (ongoing)Outsourced platform and proprietary software
2007PRIOLogistic and financial system  SwedenArmed ForcesParts of the system was put into use in 2009, with reports of big usability issues following.[19] In 2012 troubles with supply of spare parts was reported, causing multiple Gripen fighter jets to be put out of service. The air force was operating at a 70% capacity, another area was reported to operate at a 3% capacity with half of the staff not able to work at all. It would take up to a year to restore capacity.[20][21] At this point the cost to scrap the project and develop a new one was estimated to be SEK 11bn ($1.3bn). Not seen as an alternative, the development continued and the original budget of SEK 2.4bn was increased to 4bn.[22] In 2015 the project was still on its way to be fully implemented.SEK 4bn ($470m)[23] (ongoing)Technical aspects outsourced
2013Universal CreditWelfare payments system consolidation  United KingdomCentral governmentThe schedule has slipped, with the final delivery date now expected to be 2021, although the system is gradually being introduced. In 2013, only one of four planned pilot sites went live on the originally scheduled date, and the pilot was restricted to extremely simple cases.£12.8bn (estimated) (£2.2bn)[24]Outsourced[25]
2010Standard Business Reporting (Australian Taxation Office)Electronic Reporting to Government  AustraliaStatutory authority6 years after program started in 2010, approximately $800m to $1bn has been spent in total. A significant portion of this spend was composed of contracting fees to IBM[26] and Fujitsu.[27] As of early 2016, business take up of electronic reporting was 2-3%. Program has also suffered from significant scope creep[28] and confused objectives.[29] It is likely that choice of XBRL as the reporting format is the main driver behind low take-up (due to its obscurity and high implementation cost [30][31][32] relative to other technical standards).~$1bn to date (ongoing)Technical aspects outsourced

See also

edit

References

edit
edit