User contributions for 93.36.190.141

22 October 2018

• 17:2817:28, 22 October 2018diff hist −7‎ Talk:Asian fetish‎ →‎This Entire Article Is Racist
• 17:2717:27, 22 October 2018diff hist +340‎ Talk:Asian fetish‎ →‎This Entire Article Is Racist

15 October 2018

• 12:5212:52, 15 October 2018diff hist −1,109‎ Cabiria‎ The controversy section is made up. The two sources provided talk ONLY of the movie’s aestetics. To say the movie or d’annunzio are controversial (neither of them is, as Cabiria is teched in filmmaking school and he is celebrated everywhere in italy) and to go as far as to claim this movie is fascist (when the movie is from 1914 and fascism was created in 1922) or to even compare it to birth of a nation, sources are needed, which here are not provided. The two sources talk of something elseTag: section blanking
• 12:3012:30, 15 October 2018diff hist −20‎ Andrew Brunson‎No edit summary

26 September 2018

• 21:2721:27, 26 September 2018diff hist +326‎ User talk:AfroThundr3007730‎ →‎Sorry for the trouble on Contributor Covenant wiki page.
• 21:1021:10, 26 September 2018diff hist +121‎ User talk:AfroThundr3007730‎ →‎Sorry for the trouble on Contributor Covenant wiki page.
• 21:0921:09, 26 September 2018diff hist +452‎ User talk:AfroThundr3007730‎ →‎Sorry for the trouble on Contributor Covenant wiki page.
• 20:1620:16, 26 September 2018diff hist −58‎ Contributor Covenant‎ grammar fixed
• 20:1620:16, 26 September 2018diff hist +53‎ Contributor Covenant‎ Undid revision 861351044 by 93.36.190.141 (talk)Tag: Undo
• 20:1520:15, 26 September 2018diff hist −53‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Issues raised by critics
• 20:1220:12, 26 September 2018diff hist +71‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Success
• 20:0920:09, 26 September 2018diff hist +71‎ Contributor Covenant‎ This is what the source says
• 20:0720:07, 26 September 2018diff hist −12‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Success
• 20:0620:06, 26 September 2018diff hist −63‎ Contributor Covenant‎No edit summary
• 20:0520:05, 26 September 2018diff hist −136‎ Contributor Covenant‎No edit summary
• 20:0220:02, 26 September 2018diff hist 0‎ Contributor Covenant‎No edit summary
• 20:0120:01, 26 September 2018diff hist −945‎ Contributor Covenant‎ Repetition of lead phrase
• 20:0020:00, 26 September 2018diff hist +4‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Criticism
• 20:0020:00, 26 September 2018diff hist +722‎ Contributor Covenant‎ Relevant as per Eric S. Raymond reporting on itTag: Undo
• 19:5819:58, 26 September 2018diff hist +125‎ Contributor Covenant‎ More context given, otherwise why should Jones cite this instance?
• 19:5519:55, 26 September 2018diff hist −498‎ Contributor Covenant‎ This should be the first sentence as it clarify the argument of the paragraph. The meritocracy part, written like this, is OTTag: references removed
• 19:5419:54, 26 September 2018diff hist +104‎ Contributor Covenant‎ Jay Maynard claims this as per sourcesTag: references removed
• 19:3919:39, 26 September 2018diff hist −25‎ Contributor Covenant‎ Reverting POV edit: you can't say he "agrees" it he says the complete opposite. Faithfullness to sources before everythin
• 19:2119:21, 26 September 2018diff hist +12‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Negative reception
• 19:2019:20, 26 September 2018diff hist +1‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Negative reception
• 19:2019:20, 26 September 2018diff hist +2‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Negative reception
• 19:1819:18, 26 September 2018diff hist +315‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Negative reception
• 19:1519:15, 26 September 2018diff hist +130‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Negative reception
• 19:1219:12, 26 September 2018diff hist 0‎ Contributor Covenant‎ →‎Negative reception
• 19:0019:00, 26 September 2018diff hist −564‎ Contributor Covenant‎ the rewording done by tnordloh wasn't faithfull to the sources: words can be change but the concept should be in line with the source

11 August 2018

• 10:1010:10, 11 August 2018diff hist +10‎ Talk:Sarah Jeong‎ →‎Change "social media" in «(her) hiring sparked a strongly negative reaction in (...) social media» to "conservative social media" OR "some social media"
• 10:0810:08, 11 August 2018diff hist +481‎ Talk:Sarah Jeong‎ →‎Change "social media" in «(her) hiring sparked a strongly negative reaction in (...) social media» to "conservative social media" OR "some social media"

8 August 2018

• 15:2115:21, 8 August 2018diff hist +624‎ Talk:Sarah Jeong‎ →‎RfC: Separate section on tweets?
• 15:1315:13, 8 August 2018diff hist +205‎ Talk:Sarah Jeong‎ →‎Proposal to include quotes in the article
• 15:1015:10, 8 August 2018diff hist +262‎ Talk:Sarah Jeong‎ →‎RfC: Separate section on tweets?

4 August 2018

• 10:3310:33, 4 August 2018diff hist +400‎ Talk:Sarah Jeong‎ →‎Alternate proposal

29 July 2018

• 12:5812:58, 29 July 2018diff hist −52‎ The Death and Return of Superman‎No edit summary

22 July 2018

• 15:5515:55, 22 July 2018diff hist +87‎ Post-truth politics‎No edit summary
• 08:5608:56, 22 July 2018diff hist +7‎ Futurism‎ →‎1920s and 1930s
• 08:5508:55, 22 July 2018diff hist −39‎ Futurism‎ →‎1920s and 1930s

4 July 2018

• 17:4217:42, 4 July 2018diff hist +5‎ Talk:Bimbo‎ →‎Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:4017:40, 4 July 2018diff hist +370‎ Talk:Bimbo‎ →‎Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:3717:37, 4 July 2018diff hist 0‎ Talk:Bimbo‎ →‎Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:3517:35, 4 July 2018diff hist +98‎ Talk:Bimbo‎ →‎Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 17:0617:06, 4 July 2018diff hist +127‎ User talk:Bagumba‎ →‎Bimbo
• 17:0417:04, 4 July 2018diff hist +2,043‎ Talk:Bimbo‎ →‎Definition for the WP:Lead sentence
• 16:2116:21, 4 July 2018diff hist +2,537‎ User talk:Bagumba‎ →‎Daniel Kickert
• 16:1816:18, 4 July 2018diff hist +1‎ User talk:331dot/Archive 6‎No edit summary
• 16:1816:18, 4 July 2018diff hist +2,537‎ User talk:331dot/Archive 6‎ →‎User:Duckadea
• 15:5215:52, 4 July 2018diff hist +933‎ User talk:Flyer22 Frozen‎ you can't delete other user's messages.Tag: Undo