This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
National Basketball Association was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required. * Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about NBA. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about NBA at the Reference desk.
Section sizes
Lua error in Module:Section_sizes at line 156: attempt to perform arithmetic on field '?' (a nil value).
Good eye. Apparently when the other parts of the Pistons' entry were updated to account for the move to Little Caesars, they didn't update the coordinates.
Which gets me thinking. Why do we have the coordinates in the first place? oknazevad (talk) 12:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The corresponding tables for MLB and NFL have them too. I found them useful for a project that finds hypothetical divisions that minimize the total intradivision distances. I had other sources for each league but wanted to check against one that was (mostly) more up-to-date. Lotterdata (talk) 16:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Oknazevad: In my opinion, listing coordinates is nothing more than WP:NOTCATALOG. In addition, most times the corporate headquarters of the team is in a completely different place than their main arena. – sbaio 17:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
A good point. I don't think they're meant to serve as coordinates for the teams, but in lieu of listing addresses for the arenas. A few years back there was a couple of editors insisting on adding coordinates to everything despite the lack of meaningful coordinates on some topics (like trying to have one coordinate point for a transcontinental highway), so it may be a holdover from that. But I still think they're of limited use and anyone wanting the exact location of an arena can click the link to the arena article. I don't think losing them here would be a detriment to article quality. oknazevad (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I agree, I feel a bit useless info. Just tacked on to a table. If someone was curious, they could easily get the same info by clicking the arena page and seeing the location in the infobox.
Or is there a way to 'hide' the LAT/LONG behind the globe icon so the coords are neatly placed off to the side and now taking up so much visual space? Like a 'globe' icon inside the Location column after the city name? Moonraker0022 (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've been wondering this myself too. For nearly every other league, the columns are used to list Head Coach. Who comes to this page looking for arena coordinates over head coaches? Hawksfan7358 (talk) 04:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The annual edit/revert season is among us and with free agency starting at 6:00pm EST tonight, I thought I'd come hear to clear up the logistics for angsty editors (like myself...).
Tonight, and over the next week, we should see many very reliable, yet not official, reports of players "planning to" and "have agreed to" free agency deals. This will of course also happen with trades usually being broken by Adrian Wojnarowski and Shams Charania. These reports are very reliable, and the wording is very key in determining the likelihood of the scenario. While it is very likely that the moves stated clearly and confidently by these high level reporters are much more likely to come to fruition than not, we have seen scenarios where deals have fallen through due to medical concerns, not making a specific deadline, or even just a change of decision during moratorium.
With this prefaced, if we have a hard time updating the lead and info-box of players during this time, I think it is important to note this information in the Professional Career sections of a players timeline while specifically mentioning that it was "widely reported" or something along those lines. I feel that until is officially announced, the timeline should be updated with the new team and information while the info-box and lead could remain the same. RichieConant34 (talk) 15:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why are the coordinates of the arena considered an important piece of information on the list of teams? Wouldn't a listing of current Head Coaches make more sense and be more in line with how other sports are formatted? Hawksfan7358 (talk) 22:09, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Hawksfan7358: I agree that there is no reason to list coordinates. I guess it would be best if this was asked at WT:NBA since more editors will probably see it. – sbaio 15:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago44 comments25 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved the subtopic articles. There is consensus that National Basketball Association should remain as it is, as indiciated in MOS:ACROTITLE. While there are comments to rerun the other articles separately, there is a consensus to move the other articles listed in here, per WP:CONCISE and WP:SHORTFORM. – robertsky (talk) 12:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Strong oppose for the league's article itself, weak oppose for the others. Despite sources almost always using the initials for North American sports leagues, that does not necessarily make the initials the common name. O.N.R.(talk) 13:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Strong oppose since that is the standard for organizations and that is why redirects are created for easily recognizable abbreviations of such organizations. In addition, the nominator is making false claim in its nomination, because certainly not "all sources" use NBA. Even the league itself uses "National Basketball Association" in its press releases. – sbaio 13:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose moving the main National Basketball Association article. Historical consensus for that page and the other main North American sports league articles has been to strictly follow MOS:ACROTITLE and WP:AT § Avoid ambiguous abbreviations, and thus avoid those abbreviations. As Sbaio implied above, these leagues and some media sources may still use the full names. And these abbreviations may not necessarily be recognizable outside the United States and Canada. As for the other detailed articles, I am neutral and they could be considered seperately as to whether they could be abbreviated like 2023–24 NBA season, because those more detailed page titles give additional specific context. Zzyzx11 (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comment At this point, some !voters have worked around it by itemizing which pages they disagree on moving, while supporting the rest. —Bagumba (talk) 02:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@ScarletViolet, if consensus supported the moves, we should require the same for WNBA-related articles. - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose moving main National Basketball Association page, Support moving the others. Rikster2 (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose National Basketball Association → NBA. No opinion on the rest, but consider withdrawing and starting a new RM for them. Srnec (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose moving the names of any of these articles. Catfurball (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comment: Next best option. which should not be controversial, is creating redirects similar to NBA → National Basketball Association. Some of them do not have the concise redirect. - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all except standalone National Basketball Association The main National Basketball Association page's existing name is consistent with MOS:ACROTITLE and its Central Intelligence Agency example (...in view of arguments that the full name is used in professional and academic publications). The full "National Basketball Association" expansion can be seen on The New York Times, for example. For the others, where NBA is part of a longer descriptive title, the WP:CONCISE policy seems more applicable. The desciptive titles aren't ambiguous, as they are basketball specific. There are other longstanding examples such as NBA All-Star Game, NBA Finals, and NBA draft, where the meaning is clear, and the primary topic of NBA is anyways the basketball league.—Bagumba (talk) 04:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all but National Basketball Association – The abbreviation is used far more extensively; many news articles from sites without overly strict style guidelines don't even mention the full name of the league at all. SounderBruce 06:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all – the same case with FIFA. Those who oppose, what do non-English speaking people call it? You never see English speakers refer FIFA as Fédération internationale de football association, so why should NBA?
This is English Wikipedia. It's out of scope what non-English speakers call the National Basketball Association. —Bagumba (talk) 16:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support. The acronym "NBA" is globally associated with the "National Basketball Associaton", so I don't see a problem with that, as per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 18:04, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all but NBA (neutral on that one) for the sake of concision. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all but the first, per many other rationales above. Dicklyon (talk) 23:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all but the first, in agreement with Dicklyon & others on this. GoodDay (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Leave the main article, move the others per just about everyone else. oknazevad (talk) 16:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all except the first, don't want to be left out in case there's a dinner. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support all but the first, and at the dinner I want the prize for being the first to mention WP:SHORTFORM and the examples therein. (Bagumba mentioned CIA, but not WP:SHORTFORM.)
Oppose. Completely unnecessary and adds needless ambiguity. Abbreviations are usually best avoided for article titles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Comment: Is the opposition assuming the readers are 2 years old and learning world sports culture for the first time? If so, it does not take a rocket scientist to put two and two together... or perhaps these newcomers should avoid these one-off pages and start out at the main articles then to learn the basics first before diving into these more esoteric topics. - BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.