A note for people who visit my talk page

edit

Vandalism is pretty much never my intent when I edit Wikipedia. If I make a mistake, please calmly let me know on this talk page and I will listen to you. Also, I may create a Wikipedia account sometime in the future, which will be indicated by a sudden stop in editing from this IP. When I do make an account, I will not tell you its username because you don't need to know. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit

Hello, I'm Babegriev. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Splatoon (video game) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Babegriev (talk) 19:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 22:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Babegriev. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lanthanide have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not add a good article template to an article that has not undergone a review per WP:GAN. You can find information on how to nominate that article there. Babegriev (talk) 23:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Swass. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Babegriev (talk) 23:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

What do you think is vandalism? -24.115.255.37

July 2021

edit

Hello, I'm SWinxy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Link (The Legend of Zelda) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. SWinxy (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021

edit
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2022

edit
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 01:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

3rr

edit

so according to something like the 3rr, it says u need to get reverted 3 times to get blocked, is that right? i only edited the page twice and it was because i didnt know the difference between "hyrulean" and "hylian" and wasnt trying to vandalize (most of my edits are good faith edits/just fixing spelling/grammar). 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

You've been changing this for years, 3RR is simply a bright rule in ongoing edit wars. -- ferret (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
ok ill stop anyway do u play zelda 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
ill stop when my block ends in a year because i googled the difference; hyrulean is the correct term. also i dont need to be unblocked, i was just asking a question.
Also on Typhoon Marge, there is a grammar error; In the first paragraph, it says:
"Although it was a category three typhoon, Marge took the record of being the most biggest cyclone from 1951 for 28 years, until it got preceded by Typhoon Tip in 1979, having doubled the size."
Can you fix it saying "most biggest" and make it just say "biggest"? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
If i were to ask to be unblocked, i would try to submit an appeal. (just so you know not to unblock me) 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
can you fix the grammar error on Typhoon Marge (1951) please? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
ill fix it ItsMeKeys (talk) 21:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
thx 24.115.255.37 (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
On 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, it says: "A few days later, the cyclone approached Ireland as a large and intense a European windstorm." Can you remove the "a" from when it says "a European windstorm"? I can't do it because: 1. the page is semi-protected. 2: i am blocked. Can someone fix it like how @ItsMeKeys fixed the error on Typhoon Marge? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

ERRORS HERE

edit

On 2022 Atlantic hurricane season, it says: "A few days later, the cyclone approached Ireland as a large and intense a European windstorm." Can you remove the "a" from when it says "a European windstorm"? I can't do it because:1. the page is semi-protected.2: i am blocked.Can someone fix it like how @ItsMeKeys fixed the error on Typhoon Marge? 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

sure ill do it. ItsMeKeys (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
tommorow ItsMeKeys (talk) 03:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
ok thanks 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
you didnt do it 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
holidays were crazy lol.honestly i think you should just appeal your ban if it bugs you so much ItsMeKeys (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
it was done anyway+the page is also semi protected i think for like 2 more weeks so i might just create an acct tbh 24.115.255.37 (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
You, the person behind the computer, are blocked. Creating an account will result in it being blocked as well. Appeal your block as per the instructions in the block template first. -- ferret (talk) 18:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
i highly encourage you to appeal the block,as your recent actions in bringing up grammer mistakes show that you do not intend to harm wikipedia ItsMeKeys (talk) 17:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I will try to appeal my block if and only if I have to create an account before my block ends. If not, I will just wait until the block ends, since I seem to be only one who cares about the grammar errors. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be autoblocked if you create it before your block ends,because that's considered block evasion

ItsMeKeys (talk) 03:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
ok 24.115.255.37 (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
if i want to create an acct first ill try to appeal my block 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
i have diarrhea and this comment was typed in the bathroom while i was on the toilet 24.115.255.37 (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
i know about block evasion lol, i got banned on scratch for evading a ban on an alt of mine, but the alt got banned for impersonating myself so i basically got banned for nothing 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 24.115.255.37 (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
what. ItsMeKeys (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
one of my alt accounts on scratch got banned for no reason and my main got banned for evading the block 💀 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

Hello! I'm MichaelMaggs. Your recent edit(s) to the page Mondegreen appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "Layd" is in original text. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ah okay. I googled it and it said laid, tbh tho i dont know everything, i was just saying cuz layd is bad spelling lol 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Beyond the Periodic Table

edit

Hi, re, your discussion.I am actually writing a paper on this, based on what we think we know about the hypothetical Element 164.essentially there is evidence of superheavy elements such as Berkelium and more familar ones like Techetium in stars, implying the decay of much more massive elements well beyond the "Island of Stability".This could be explainable as asteroids containing them (presumably from colliding neutron stars or other phenomena) impacting the star's surface and disintegrating.Now what we do know is that Uranium is somewhat stable but the r-process can't by itself explain the isotopic ratios observed in nature.Laforgium is actually of sufficient density to explain the anomalous mass of some asteroids and Psyche may contain quite largeamounts of them making it worth investigating if these elements could be found on Earth in meteorites.I've also looked into the possibility that superheavy elements may have properties not found in nature such as the inner electrons radiating energy as infrared light as an additional method of achieving meta-stability and electron pairing occuring with relatively simple compounds ie superconductivity well above room temperature. It could well be that the magnetic field of some large "super-Earth" planets may be enhanced considerably by this mechanism if the local geology permits, providing a mechanism for life to evolve on sub optimal planets near flare stars. 91.190.161.160 (talk) 03:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

What is Laforgium (my guess is that it is the name you'd propose for 164 if you are the discoverer)
Anyway, that's cool. I'll be sure to check it out when you're done with it, just send me the link once it's done! 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Sandbox. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk me) 18:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay I won't do it again and besides I thought that that page was a sandbox talk page, as noted by the template found on it. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Vandalism was not my intent. The intent of that edit was to let people know NOT to vandalize the article to add things about the Gen Alpha slang "Sigma". A similar note, for example, is found in Dream Island to get people to not vandalize that article to be about BFDI. Both notes are hidden so that they only show up when source editing (if the notes were added correctly, which I am pretty sure they were)

EDIT: The original message was removed 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Theroadislong With all due respect, I feel like it would be kind of harsh to label this as vandalism. It might've not been constructive, but it seems like good-faith. Feel free to correct me. There might be some background here that I don't know about or something. GoldRomean (talk) 20:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
This seems like a WP:CIR issue rather than pure vandalism... ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Dossor, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. This edit summary is unacceptable per WP:BNTV. You've been already been warned multiple times about your edit summary. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 23:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I'll stop. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Testing redirects please delete as a g2 test page

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Testing redirects please delete as a g2 test page, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ternera (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay. The page was mainly meant to see if I could redirect to an external page and/or user page 24.115.255.37 (talk) 20:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immediate Murder Professionals (June 24)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mdann52 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mdann52 (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh sorry 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I used the article wizard, check AfC/redirects 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello, 24.115.255.37!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mdann52 (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Immediate Murder Professionals

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Immediate Murder Professionals, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ternera (talk) 21:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Delete it, but as a G7 instead of G2. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Comment on Redirects for Creation Page

edit

Thanks to your contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects. You happened to open the page as I was in the middle of fulfilling the user's request so it appeared that the page already existed (it didn't before I started). I reverted your comments to prevent confusion. Sorry for the mixup! Garsh (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

oh lol 24.115.255.37 (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edit summaries

edit

Are a bit more hard core than we generally prefer. Appreciate the help with vandalism, but please tone down the edit summaries. Even the Cabal doesn't have any professional assassins on retainer... (I think). -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Immediate Murder Professionals are not real; my edit summaries are not serious. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:51, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I know. Neither was my reference to the Cabal. But yeah, the edit summaries are a bit on the edgy side. Thanks again for the help with vandalism. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
you're welcome. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 03:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Related, you may wanna stop reverting on Ducks are birds' talk page. It just gives admins more work when it comes to revdel. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay. I stopped. His talk page access got revoked, so he can't do anything more. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 04:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Appreciate it but please stop now.

edit

Appreciate your help fighting vandalism but please stop arguing with that Daiji Igarashi user. The more you're replying to his insults, the more worse it gets. Also, looking at your past comments towards blocked users, you may want to see WP:BNTV and WP:RBI. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I was going to log off anyway. It's 1:29 AM. 24.115.255.37 (talk) 05:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

New message from ComplexRational

edit
Hello, 24.115.255.37. You have new messages at Talk:Isotopes of flerovium.
Message added 12:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Complex/Rational 12:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply