Wiki How:Articles for deletion/Athenäum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Athenäum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 13:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete: I'm not certain that this journal fails WP:NJOURNALS, but I'm also struggling to prove that it passes WP:NJOURNALS. I'm mostly turning up things about the 18thC Athenäum after which this journal is named. As a scholar of Romanticism, I would not say it is influential or historically important in the English-language branch of the field. (I don't know anything about it.) But it's longstanding enough that I wouldn't be surprised if a German speaker turned up evidence of its importance in Germany. Unless that additional evidence arrives, though, I think deletion is appropriate. ~ oulfis 🌸(talk) 01:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete for lack of evidence of notability, and lack of anything to say beyond its existence and editorial board. I ran across this one a few weeks ago while trying to find out whether we have an article on the Athenaeum journal founded 1913 in Pavia — we don't, and I didn't create one because I wasn't convinced it was notable. But at least that one has a longer history. This one is too recent for an argument along those lines. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.