Wiki How:Articles for deletion/Bahrain Mirror

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bahrain Mirror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fail WP:WEB and WP:GNG, no reliable sources and the article's creator use their website as reference, the article also a WP:COATRACK and has unrelated things to create a fake notability. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 00:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Bahrain. AllyD (talk) 07:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.