Wiki How:Articles for deletion/James Rice (cricketer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 GoUSA 21:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James Rice (cricketer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure to meet Notability

Also category G (sports), I suppose. If someone knows how to include the second category to the top, feel free. -LlywelynII (talk) 18:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fix'd -LlywelynII (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Having played first-class cricket, the highest level of cricket for domestic (ie non-international) teams, he meets the requirement laid down in WP:ATHLETE. JH (talk page) 21:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per User:Jhall1 above. Johnlp (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:CRIN, though this is the closest I have seen. SGGH ^ping! 23:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep —Aaroncrick (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per WP:CRIN. Harrias (talk) 08:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep WP:CRIN —SpacemanSpiff 09:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per JHall. I wonder if WP:CRIC should link "amateur" to something - can't quite find what - along the lines of Gentlemen vs Players for historical players such as this. Amateur to modern eyes does imply non-notability, hence this debate.—MDCollins (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:ATHLETE. --Dweller (talk) 10:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.